🔗 Share this article

Keir Starmer is facing internal dissent after ministers abandoned plans to provide employees immediate safeguards against unfair dismissal, a U-turn that breaches the Labour manifesto.

Parliamentarians Raise Alarms

Parliamentarians such as a former minister who spearheaded the employment rights bill raised objections over the climbdown declared by ministers.

Ministers have axed the proposal to remove the 24-month "qualifying period" for workers to make an unfair dismissal claim and allow them to do so from the first day in a new job, in an attempt to pass the legislation through parliament.

Legislative Deadlock

The legislation became trapped in a dispute involving peers and MPs over the original plan to provide employee safeguards from the start, along with provisions to ban "exploitative" zero-hours contracts.

The administration now aims to establish the protection regarding wrongful termination after six months of service as an alternative, whereas other immediate protections to parental leave and illness compensation remain scheduled to go ahead, becoming active in April 2026.

Opposition and Condemnation

The parliamentary representative for the northeastern constituency labeled the action as a "utter breach of trust" and vowed to push for its overturning.

"We must oppose that halfway measure."

"This represents misguided policy and I plan to fight to reverse this让步."

Another Labour MP voiced disappointment concerning inadequate dialogue, remarking: "There has been zero consultation with the PLP. Peers shouldn't override over a manifesto commitment, therefore why did we surrender??"

Broader Implications

Another representative commented: "Businesses should not worry from day-one rights, while employees have much to lose from businesses who doesn't want day-one rights."

The ex-labor secretary affirmed that the decision "definitely is a pledge violation."

Ministerial Explanation

The learning department head declared remained a "substantial likelihood" the execution of the employment rights bill could have experienced setbacks without the cabinet's decision regarding a U-turn over immediate safeguards against unjust firing.

"Consultation has occurred on the point around wrongful termination and the duration requirement with employers, the TUC and ministers, and subsequent to that dialogue there's been agreement concerning future direction, that represents positive development."

The secretary highlighted that "It means that the eligibility timeframe will come down from two years to six months, and this accompanies significant first-day entitlements around sick pay and about family time off."

"Yet the threat existing without forward movement, those crucial protections could remain inactive beginning second quarter 2026."

When questioned about if it constituted a broken promise, the secretary answered: "In the manifesto, the promise indicated was that we planned to cooperate with trade unions, with business, with community groups, through dialogue regarding these safeguards we planned to introduce."

"Therefore, two components exist regarding that matter, throughout the campaign document, the significant entitlements and the dialogue."